Pupil Premium
Pupil premium strategy statement – Simon Langton Girls’ Grammar School
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged students.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the outcomes for disadvantaged students last academic year.
School overview
Detail |
Data |
Number of students in school (Yrs 7-11) |
888 (Sept 24) |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible students |
9.1% (Sept 24) |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) |
2021-24 |
Date this statement was published |
November 2023 |
Date on which it will be reviewed |
October 2024 |
Statement authorised by |
Chair of Governors |
Pupil premium lead |
Robert Green |
Governor / Trustee lead |
Mike Albury |
Funding overview
Detail |
Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£ 85805 (Based on April 2023 student roll) |
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year |
£ 19596 |
Pupil premium (and recovery premium) funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£105,401 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
Our goal is to ensure that the most disadvantaged students leave Simon Langton Girls’ Grammar with excellent academic outcomes, in line with their peers and above national averages. Beyond their academic achievements, we will ensure they participate in every opportunity, have all the resources and support they require be that academic or pastoral, play a full and active role in our school life and mature into well-rounded young adults ready and able to contribute to society and lead fulfilling lives.
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged students.
N.B. Owing to the small number of students who receive Pupil Premium it is difficult to identify ‘consistent’ barriers to learning as these change quite significantly from year to year although some key themes have been identified below. Nonetheless, we ensure close monitoring of attendance, homework completion, participation in clubs and extra-curricular groups/societies and academic progress for Pupil premium students through our Academic Leads and Pastoral Managers. Equally all teachers and form tutors are made aware of those students in receipt of pupil premium to ensure their progress is also monitored at a subject level and through form tutor mentoring.
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
1 |
Lower outcomes in Maths for Pupil Premium students. The attainment of disadvantaged students in GCSE maths is generally lower than the overall outcomes. |
2 |
Lower outcomes in Science for Pupil Premium students. The attainment of disadvantaged students in GCSE Sciences is generally lower than the overall outcomes. |
3 |
Lower overall attendance levels for Pupil Premium students. |
4 |
Ensuring access to appropriate resources and extra-curricular activities |
5 |
Promoting and encouraging high aspirations - Staff feedback and student discussions have identified that some disadvantaged students may have limited aspirations for their futures and may lack awareness of alternative routes with financial incentives such as post-16 or degree apprenticeships. |
6 |
Secure and stable emotional well-being. Social, emotional and mental health issues have seen a significant increase. These challenges have an adverse impact on disadvantaged students, impacting on their attainment as well as their wellbeing. We have seen a significant increase in the number of students requesting support via the school pastoral and counselling teams as well as externally. |
7 |
Development of effective academic skills (organisation, revision etc.) and metacognitive and self-regulation strategies. Examination outcomes, teacher feedback, assessments and discussions with students indicate that students from disadvantaged backgrounds can have limited effective learning habits which has an impact on their overall attainment and confidence. This may be the result of limited resources or appropriate study space to work at home. The pandemic has exacerbated this. |
8 |
Diagnosis and support for identified SEND - Data suggests that a number of disadvantaged students with possible SEND are not accessing appropriate diagnostic support due to the extended timescales involved and not being able to access private routes, potentially limiting the most appropriate support being implemented. |
9 |
Relatively small cohort results in frequently changing ‘challenges’ – individual -level monitoring needed |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
Improve overall attendance of PP students in line with school average |
By July 2024 attendance of Pupil Premium students will be inline with the school average |
Improve GCSE outcomes in Maths and Science |
By September 2024 GCSE outcomes for Pupil Premium students in Maths and Science will be closer to the school average with a positive progress measure |
Improve P8 for PP students |
By September 2024 an improvement to the P8 score for Pupil Premium students compared to previous years |
Improve A8 for PP students |
By September 2024 an improvement to the A8 score for Pupil Premium students compared to previous years |
Number of PP students going to HE/Degree apprenticeships |
By September 2025 there will be an increase in the number of Pupil Premium students (when in Year 11) attending HE/Degree apprenticeships |
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium) funding this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
We have used the EEF ‘Guide to Pupil Premium’ and ‘Menu of Approaches’ as the basis for identifying effective support and interventions.
Teaching
Budgeted cost: £ 37000
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
CPD: Teacher training in school focusing on core areas – Questioning, Spacing and retrieval practice. CPD focus on Feedback. Increased participation in NPQ programmes. Specific CPD focusing on Pupil Premium identification and support. Specific CPD focusing on supporting students with SEND and implementing Kent’s mainstream core standards. |
EEF recommendations focusing on high-quality teaching. T&L toolkit: EEF Feedback - +6 |
1,2,4,5,7 |
Staff working parties focusing on: Feedback; Homework; Inclusion and Literacy across the curriculum. |
EEF recommendations focusing on high-quality teaching, T&L toolkit Homework - +5 |
1,2,3,5,7 |
Ensure resources are available for all students and especially for vulnerable students |
Financial deprivation may limit access to necessary resources |
1,2,4 |
Maths – Purchase of additional resources; appointment of HLTA to support all Pupil Premium students both in class and as part of targeted academic support; Increase number of GCSE Maths groups from 6 to 8 |
Lower outcomes in GCSE maths. EEF recommendations for targeted support and TA support. Smaller group sizes assist in closer support of vulnerable students. T&L toolkit: Collaborative learning approaches - +5 Feedback - +6 Small group tuition - +4 |
1,4,5 |
|
Reducing class size - +2 |
|
Science - Increase staffing capacity/Increase the number of groups at GCSE from 6 to 8. Additional Science lesson in Year 9 focusing on research and ‘real- world’ application to promote aspirational goals |
Lower outcomes in GCSE Science (primarily Biology and Double award Science). Increase dedicated time to subject area. Reduce overall class sizes at GCSE which benefits all students. Generate intrinsic motivation through links to ‘real-world’ outcomes rather than ‘incentive or reward based’ motivation. T&L Toolkit: Class size: +2 Collaborative Learning: +5 Feedback: +8 |
2,4,5 |
Targeted academic support
Budgeted cost: £ 28000
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Support of Academic Leads to lead data tracking, monitoring and implementation of support |
Centralised support, identifying barriers to learning on an individual level whilst offering a safe, secure, supportive approach T&L Toolkit: Metacognition and self-regulation - +7 |
1,2,4,5,7,9 |
Closer tracking and monitoring of academic progress by all subject leaders and teachers through new monitoring system Regular reflection on progress and outcomes of PP students in Line management meetings with actions developed and implemented as a result |
Through closer, more detailed tracking, subject specific approaches can be taken to support disadvantaged (and all) students. Based on EEF ‘menu’, approaches can include: TA deployment, one to one and small group tuition, additional resources, re-teaching/adjusting to address misconceptions |
1,2,3,4,5,9 |
Employment and use of TAs to support students with SEND and disadvantaged students |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches and guidance on deployment of TAs T&L toolkit: TA interventions - +4 |
1,2,5,6,7,8 |
Small group tuition – Maths |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches T&L toolkit: Small group tuition - +4 |
1,2,5,7,9 |
Lunchtime and after school subject revision sessions; Easter revision sessions |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches |
1,2,5,7,9 |
Reading age assessment at start of Year 7 to identify any potential literacy needs |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches |
5,8,9 |
Wider strategies
Budgeted cost: £ 36000
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Attendance Officer support and intervention |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches |
3 |
Help PP students explore prospective higher education and career opportunities via Head of CEIAG |
Develop intrinsic motivation through aspiration |
5 |
Full engagement in the breadth of experiences available through school; Trips, clubs etc. |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches |
4,5,6 |
Access to specific curricular and extra-curricular activities; Music lessons, Duke of Edinburgh etc. |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches |
4,5,6 |
Provision of IT hardware/software |
Financial deprivation may limit access to necessary resources |
4,7 |
Strong, secure emotional health and wellbeing via Pastoral Managers/counselling etc. |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches |
6 |
Provide funding for travel to and from school |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches |
3 |
Ensure all students have appropriate uniform for all aspects of the curriculum (PE etc) |
Financial deprivation may limit access to necessary resources |
4 |
Diagnostic testing via external agencies (eg. ASC diagnosis) |
EEF Pupil Premium Menu of approaches |
8 |
Total budgeted cost: £ 101,000
Part B: Review of the previous academic year
Disadvantaged student GCSE performance overview for academic year 2022-23
- 13 Students eligible for Pupil premium in Year 11
- 100% of Pupil premium students secured English and Maths GCSEs at Grade 4 or above
- Almost all outcomes were significantly higher than the national average for all students
Progress 8 |
0.19 (school average 0.5) Variation – 0.31 NB. National P8 figure for all students: -0.03 |
% Students entered for and achieving Ebacc entry |
46% entered (school average 53%) 38% achieved (school average 48%) |
Attainment 8 |
59 (school average 65.7) Variation – 6.7 Attainment 8 nationally for non- disadvantaged students – 51.1 |
Subject |
APS for all students |
APS for PP students |
Variation |
Maths |
6.4 |
5.8 |
0.6 |
English |
6.6 |
6.6 |
0 |
English and Maths |
At Grade 4+ - 100% School Average – 100% |
At Grade 5+ - 69% School Average – 90% |
|
Pupil Premium attendance was in line with overall attendance for all groups in years 7-11